Essay on Nursing

Essay on Nursing Essay on Nursing Essay on NursingNursing is a challenging and responsible profession, which though is not a mere job but also the highly ethical responsibility of individuals for outcomes of their work in the field of nursing. In fact, nursing is the responsible job of nurses, who perform their functions properly and focus on the assistance of their clients to help them to cope with their problems.At the same time, nursing is not the mere caring for people to meet their wants and to make them feel comfortable in the course of their treatment and recovery. In fact, patients do need to feel comfortable but nurses should focus on their actual needs and treatment appointed by the physician (Limentani, 1999). The treatment or procedures patients should have may be different from what clients want to do or they may be uncomfortable for clients. This is why the task of nurses is to make them feel better and involve patients in all procedures in the course of their treatment to maximize the effectiveness of their treatment.Therefore, nursing should be balanced and based on individual skills of every nurse to deliver nursing care for patients and help them to recover and cope with their health problems. In this regard, nurses should be able to provide counseling services for their clients because the psychological assistance is helpful for the establishment of positive interpersonal relations between individuals (Sloane, et al., 2003). As a result, nurses can help patients to recover faster and effectively, if they gain the client confidence in their nurses.Thus, nursing is the hard job, which involves professional and ethical responsibility of nurses for health of patients and provides them with nursing and counseling services.

Haemon vs Creon essays

Haemon vs Creon essays Haemon enters and tells his father he will accept his ruling, due to the fatherly authority Creon has over him. Haemon refers to him as his good advisor and will follow any path Creon sees fit. This pleases Creon because as he sees it, his word is law in all things. He goes on ranting on the importance of a good son and advises him to forget Antigone. Creon tells Haemon she has gone against his orders and he does not want his people to see him break his word. Despite their kinship he, If I bring up my own family To flout me, there will be no holding others. A man who sees his family obey him Will have authority in public matters. Creon believes that disobedience is the worst of evils, and that discipline is what holds everything together, so we must stand up for law and order to keep the city together. Haemon interjects with the backing of reason which the gods endow mankind with, suggesting that his father not be so rash in his decision. He is not going against his father; he just wants him to wear on open mind. The rest of the debate supports the fact that Sophocles seems to favor Haemons views on political authority. The playwright makes the reader side with Haemon due to justice and reason. For example, by comparing Creon to the tree that does not bend is an awesome analogy; the reader knows what happens in the end and what eventually will overcome in the end. Also all the rebuttals from Haemon in reply to his fathers childish remarks make for a better argument of justice within reason, as opposed to his fathers reasoningthis is my word, hence, the law. ...

Preexisting Duty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Preexisting Duty - Essay Example Likewise, if a party is already bound by contract to perform a certain duty, that duty cannot serve as consideration for a second contract. However, if, during performance of a contract, extraordinary difficulties arise that were totally unforeseen at the time the contract was formed, a court may allow an exception to the rule. In this case, Jones and DR entered the initial contract which Jones need to build a DR Drug Store for DR. The contract is valid since it had met the four requirements. However, in the second contract, which is a modification of the initial contract, the legally sufficient consideration was missing. What Jones promise to do in the second contract was to build the DR Drug Store, which they already have legal duty to do in the initial contract. Due to the preexisting duty rule, the second contract was not enforceable. Moreover, the accident that happened to Jones was not an unforeseen difficulty. Although the reason for the collapse of the trusses was not due to faults or deficiencies in the building plan prepared by Jones, as a construction company, they should have anticipated for unforeseen events or included clauses in their first contract such as the liquidated damages clause. Thus, Jones cannot argue about this